Cape Chemical
By: moehook • October 11, 2016 • Essay • 1,193 Words (5 Pages) • 1,332 Views
Page 1 of 5
TIPs for Student Cases – FIN 4422, Fall 2016
In every case, always ask yourself: “What are the risk factors?”
Cape Chemicals
- Do cash flow forecasts for 2008-2011
- Inflation rate = 0.02
- Ce for 2008 is given as $1.2 million; shortage inventory given as $0.8 million
- Sales target for 2008 is $78 million
- Assume principal payments are 10% of previous gross debt & interest rate =0.11
- Ignore section called “The Task”
Strong Tie Ltd
- Do cash flow forecasts for 2009-2012
- Inflation rate = 0.02
- Note the restatement of balance sheets in EXCEL financials
- to find c-factor, modify method where c = Ce ÷ (0.25*S); assume that the capacity increase will be sufficient until another investment is made in 2012 for positive growth cases
- Don’t get hung up on the restrictive covenants in the paragraph called “FINANCING;” STL has more important problems
Boston Beer
- The IPO is for only 20.8% of the total equity value
- Do valuation of several scenarios, finding the amount raised by an IPO
- Do not be sidetracked by potential price per share; before the IPO, BB can change the number of shares by split or reverse split
- Remember that IPOs suffer about a 20% underpricing and 7.5% flotation cost -- both reduce the proceeds of the issuance
- In determining the discount rate for the present values, consider the data from similar traded companies
- Inflation rate = 0.04
Continental Carriers
- Your numerical analysis should be along the lines of Tables 9.2-9.3
- A good scenario format is: [a] one optimistic operating scenario with CATO per share under SEO, and then under debt, and then under convertible exercised plus [b] one pessimistic operating scenario with CATO per share under SEO, and then under debt, and then under convertible with no exercise.
- Use the supplemental financial statements provided by your beloved professor
- Replace the nonsense about a preferred stock issuance with a potential convertible debt issuance at 7.5% coupon. Each $1,000 bond would have a conversion ratio of 42 shares. Principal payment, if needed, would be a balloon in 15 years. The first possible call would be in year 1 at a call price of $1075 — the call premium decreases by $5 per year.
- What is the primary source of “dilution” in the common stock financing sub-case?
- For this kind of analysis, set all operating costs as variable
- Inflation rate = 0.05
Ocean Carriers
- NPV analyses of the one new ship
- change the price to $30 million to be made with a downpayment of $3 million, a $3 million payment in year 1 and the remainder in year 2.
- Income tax rate = 0.35
- OCI’s WACC = 0.09. Use this as a required rate of return [that is, a discount rate] for risky cash flows.
- Contractual cash flows are less uncertain. Their required rate of return is 0.06. The risk-free rate is 0.04.
- Comment on the 15-year life policy.
- Use the 3-discount rate method
Radio One
- NPV analyses of purchasing stations from Clear Channel
- Data in Exhibits 6 & 7 are dollars; data in Exhibit 9 are $1,000s
- Case has conflicting data for non-cash charges; set yours as 1/14 of the purchase price that you determine
- Assume t = 0.41
- Use βasset to find k; add risk premium for potential financial distress [examine your heart]; this substitutes for a WACC
- OK to use continuing value
- OK to use the bottom up method
- Issue: unknown purchase price, and actual non-cash charges will be contingent on purchase price
- Each new station will need start-up transactions cash plus spontaneous wc
- Given specifics of this case, prepaid expenses and accruals are spontaneous
- When you hack a c-factor, based on all fixed assets (tangible and intangible), be ready for a shock
Seagate Technology
- Valuation of new Seagate based on Exhibit 8 [note cash transfer]; you should have another column where the growth rate is low and sustainable
- Work with historical statements to see if new management and strategies can unlock Seagate value; valuation based on this scenario
- Do some quick and dirty numerical work to see how much debt the new Seagate can bear
- Exhibit 8 gives EBITA, which is really EBITDA
- No, EBITA is not EBIT; it’s EBITDA
- you might need to go 2007 for a low, sustainable g and continuing value
- Inflation rate = 0.02
- Again, EBITA is EBITDA
Chang Dental Clinic
- Assume t=0.30
- Use valuation for equity value [no need for price per share]
- Inflation rate = 0.03
- Assume lease obligations have a PV of about $300,000
- WACC for private transactions is always difficult. Look at “Return on Assets” in one of the exhibits
- Check to see if Miller can service his financing
Victoria Chemicals (A)
- the product is a commodity. Think hard about what that means in terms of capacity utilization, tons sold in response to price per ton changes and erosion
- NPV problem — Exhibit 2 calls NPV "DCF"
- The inflation washout assumption is wrong; inflate both selling price and production cost at 2.0%
- convert Exhibit 2 to “format” tab of the “financials”
- decide and discuss which cash flows are truly incremental
- as consultant to management, tell why you include or exclude “overhead” from the NPV [that it’s a company rule is not a good reason]
- gross margin = 13.9% means the profit on a ton sold for $611, for example, is 611*0.139 = 84.93 and the production cost for that ton is 611*(1-0.139) = 526.07; if market price changes, production cost per ton remains £526.07.
- Tank cars would cost £3 million in year 2, depreciated straight line for 5 years
- Risk-free rate = 0.015, for D*t stream for new assets
Victoria Chemicals (B)
- the product is a commodity. Think hard about what that means in terms of capacity utilization, tons sold in response to price per ton changes and erosion
- NPV problem — Exhibit 1 calls NPV "DCF;"
- The inflation washout assumption is wrong; inflate both selling price and production cost at 2.0%; the proper discount rate for risky cash flows is 10%
- convert Exhibit 1 to “format” tab of the “financials”
- as consultant to management, tell why you include or exclude “overhead” from the NPV [that it’s a company rule is not a good reason]
- is the comparison to case (A) truly valid?
- for comparison purposes, assume that NPV for (A) = £10.45
- gross margin = 11.6% means the profit on a ton sold for $611, for example, is 611*0.116 = 70.88 and the production cost for that ton is 611*(1-0.116) = 540.12; if market price changes, production cost per ton remains £540.12.
- assume the staged capital investment is essentially a contract, discounted at 6%
- Risk-free rate = 0.015, contract rate = 0.06
- Use 3-discount rate method. See “format” tab on “financials” file
Aurora : Douglas Dynamics
- two valuations of Douglas Dynamics with WACC = 12.34%
- estimate the value Aurora should offer for DD
- assume an LOB by Aurora using debt for 80% to 90% of value
- interest rate on junky debt at 9.5%
- two corresponding DD cash flow forecasts
- don’t try to put valuation and CF forecast on the same spreadsheet
- inflation rate = 0.03
- income tax rate = 0.41 [0.35 federal & 0.06 state]
- can Aurora count on DD to service the debt?
...